在军事模拟领域,有很多不同的方法。 近战战术教练机、联合战术战术训练系统、战斗力战术训练或作战人员模拟2000只是美国国防部大型建模与仿真开发项目历史上的一些例子,代表了各种解决方案中的一小部分。 通常情况下,单独的模拟器是非常独特的,所以往往很难分类军事模拟,即使是经验丰富的用户。 由于军事模拟领域与其他领域不同,没有军事模拟的一般分类,这种情况进一步加剧。 为了弥补这一缺陷,这份出版物致力于提供一个在军事模拟领域的公认分类发展的第一个贡献的想法。 为此,问题领域被构造成三个主要类别(模拟器的一般功能要求、模拟器的特殊军事要求和模拟器的非功能要求)。 在此基础上,为个别类别提供适当的类别。 为了更好地理解,该分类法还应用于一个具体的示例(netlogo rebellion)。
原文题目:On the Evaluation of Military Simulations: Towards A Taxonomy of Assessment Criteria
原文:In the area of military simulations, a multitude of different approaches is available. Close Combat Tactical Trainer, Joint Tactical Combat Training System, Battle Force Tactical Training or Warfighter's Simulation 2000 are just some examples within the history of the large DoD Development Program in Modelling and Simulation, representing just a small piece of the variety of diverse solutions. Very often, individual simulators are very unique and so it is often difficult to classify military simulations even for experienced users. This circumstance is further boosted due to the fact that in the field of military simulations - unlike in other areas - no general classification for military simulations exists. To address this shortcoming, this publication is dedicated to the idea of providing a first contribution to the development of a commonly accepted taxonomy in the area of military simulations. To this end, the problem field is structured into three main categories (general functional requirements for simulators, special military requirements for simulators and non-functional requirements for simulators). Based upon that, individual categories are provided with appropriate classes. For a better understanding, the taxonomy is also applied to a concrete example (NetLogo Rebellion).
原文作者: Peter Hillmann
原文地址:https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.09340
军事仿真评估:评估标准的分类(CS CY).pdf ---来自腾讯云社区的---用户7095611
微信扫一扫打赏
支付宝扫一扫打赏